Religious conversions: views

Problems related to conversions seem to be hitting all parts of India, from the poverty-stricken tribal Orissa to the highly literate and affluent Mangalore. Militant Christianity came first, then militant Islam and now militant Hinduism. God alone knows what next, maybe militant scientologists!

Before anything, let us get one thing straight: these are middle and upper class/caste fights in which lower castes/classes get affected the worst. Religion and culture come to the mind resting above a full stomach. It is quite unfortunate that those affected most are the ones who historically are the ones affected most. Therefore, oppression does not really go away by conversions or Bajrang Dal activism, but merely takes a new form.

Christianity has always been an agressive (or as the Church prefers to call it, evangelical) religion. This seems to flow from Christ’s command to ‘spread the Good News’ . Considering the fact that most Christians do not follow Christ’s other words – like ‘remove the splinter in your eye before pointing to the one in your brother’s eye’, which essentially means getting your house in order before anything else – it is puzzling that they are so fond of spreading the Good News. Similarly, Brahmins who never have given a damn about the lot of Dalits for centuries are now trying to ‘reclaim’ them from the proselytizers. Both stink more than a little of hypocrisy.

In India atleast, religion has been an integral part of a person’s identity from time immemorial. Then why is it that people are so easily converted (which amounts to a drastic change in identity), and why are most of the converts from Hinduism to other religions rather than the other way round ? Consider the following issues:

  • Hindu rituals, for the most part are still in Sanskrit
  • Priests are still Brahmin
  • There are still temples which disallow Dalits
  • Reformation movements like the Bhakti movement have been largely suppressed or sidelined or have corrupted into mainstream thinking
  • Dalits in the hinterlands still suffer systematic deprivation and lack access to schools and healthcare

OTOH, consider features of Indian Christianity:

  • Christian rituals are adapted to the local cultural milieu. Attending a mass in English and in Santhali are radically different experiences
  • Anyone can become a priest. Most candidates who join do not become priests but come out after getting free education upto graduation and a good exposure to social service and philosophy
  • Most schools and hospitals run in tribal areas are either secular or Christian

It must be quite easy to see why religious conversions are quite high from Hinduism. New converts to Christianity get rituals highly customised to their culture, access to education (though there is usually no discrimination for admission – most Hindus would like their children to study in a ‘convent’ school). New modes of Christian worship like Praise and Worship are extremely popular among new converts and this is something that contemporary Hindu worship sorely lacks, i.e, they need to jazz it up a bit! ISKCON does a decent job of this, effecting quite a few reverse conversions, but seems like they want more white people than tribals!

It is hardly surprising that Hindus view conversions as a threat, because they are. But they have themselves to blame for the position that they are in. Any social institution that fails to adapt to changing circumstances will eventually die. Hinduism is nowhere close to this, but tensions are a sign that as a social institution (not as a philosophy : the two are very different entities) has not kept up with the times. If you don’t work for the upliftment of the poorest, don’t hold counselling sessions for youth in these fast-changing times, don’t change modes of worship to suit changing tastes and perceptions and then complain about a Christian conspiracy to undermine HInduism, you are basically missing the point. What people need is not a religion, but a means of upliftment – socially and psychologically. It is no surprise that various godmen like Sri Sri Ravishankar, Ganapati Satchidananda and innumerable others in metros like Bangalore are gaining in popularity – they offer a modern solution to contemporary human problems.

Tensions rooted in conversions to Christianity are not going to go away: like I mentioned, Christianity is quite fundamentally a proselytizing religion. What needs to be done is to adapt and stay abreast of the times – tastes, values, predispositions, culture are quite rapidly changing nowadays. It remains to be seen when Hinduism can address these issues, considering its massive inertia and elitism.


10 thoughts on “Religious conversions: views”

  1. Dalit Christians are Dalits who become Christians!

    Caste identity is not that easy to erase, it usually takes a couple of generations (I know 3-4th generation Christians who still remember they were Kshatriyas!)

    No idea about the Bomans, but that is hardly surprising. But I know for a fact that in most institutions, previous caste identity is never taken into consideration, especially in N. India.

    The link says pretty much what I have mentioned. Instead of complaining, shreenidhi ought to learn from the missionaries :) Poor people need economic upliftment, religion is secondary. That is what he says as well.

  2. I have just one question.

    Why dont you uplift the poorest of muslims…. coz you know they will kick your ass.

    You speak of evolving of a religion.

    how much has christianity evovled when you still consider you were born of incesteous children of adam and eve.

    And the church like a dumbasss agrued that the earth was not round

    You catholics hate protestants and they hate someother.

    comeon man grow up……

  3. Hey,

    This forum is for the people who think that things can be improved with some effort, and with a very impartial mental status. Whatever ‘people like Satish’ are trying to convey may look like a truth. But, when they grow up, (I hope they will, one day), they will understand that humanity is the only thing that can exist. Rest all are here to vanish.

    Author never said that Christianity is too sane. You can observe in the firs few paragraphs, the word “Terrorist Christianity” has been used. But, it does not mean that other religions are taking a proper path.

    Hope people understand this fact, and work for greater common good.

  4. First things first… one should not stop some one from converting into some religion as decision completely lies with individual(its his wish).

    Thing i am posting is only my guess i don’t have proof!.

    I didn’t find Hindus converting to any other religion than to Christianity(If you have any link please share it).

    Conversion of Hindus to Christianity is only because of Money, Influence(may be kind of a brain wash). As these lower class people are poor, suffered a lot and if they are offered money they will be ready to lose any-identity-possible. May be that’s why there are very few conversions in the upper class(no need to worry about the economic status). Many missionaries may get funds from christian missionaries outside India.

    Hindus constitute large number in India, hence the religious leaders wont feel the pressure of converting others into Hindu religion. Unlike in case of Christianity, many(at least in US) wont follow the faith properly and there are many opposing groups all over the world. Groups like Bajrang Dal,..etc just use this situation to create communal hatred, use Hindu vote bank as a whole.

  5. only because of money, not necessarily. some may (however mistakenly) think christianity is better.

    upper class converts may be few, but they have a major influence in terms of reach-out.

    Hinduism has never had a tradition of conversion, just like Judaism. Modern religions like Christianity, Islam, Buddhism OTOH needed conversions to get people initially i guess :D

    groups like Bajrang Dal seem to consist of people who find no democratic means of occupying the public space due to lack of any legitimate reason, and create and feed on baser emotions like hatred and fear of the populace to gain power and consequently legitimacy. Not very different from the Nazis.

    Im sure with sufficient ml of whisky within, breaking statues and window panes may seem like the paragon of religious expression ;)

  6. May be ‘variables’ like money, feeling of “which religion is better” should be discussed quantitatively.

    Definitely breaking glasses in frenzy may make them feel that they are stopping conversions,.. feel that they have contributed something to their religion :))).

    anyways… just one question how do you track the updates in your blog, say a comment is posted for some article. Do you get any mail? or RSS?…. because i write comments in blogs forget to check them again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s